Thursday, October 13, 2011

Alcohol doesn't make you drunk

I didn't start drinking alcohol until I was 24, extremely late for Ireland. Most of my peers were drinking by 15 or 16, social life in college was strongly focused on a binge-drinking culture where students seeking the cheapest alcohol swarmed to pretty horrible night clubs with sticky floors.

When I did finally start drinking I was working in a high school in the south of Japan. There my colleagues would gather roughly once a month for an enkai, a 'drinking party' which involved speeches, lots of raw fish and endless booze. I noticed two things about these enkai.

First, the mood tended to be boisterous, cheerful and noisy, even before teachers started to get drunk. Many teachers had to drive home after the party, so they sat among the rest sipping green tea. Yet these sober teachers were no less merry than the drunk. It made me wonder if it was not the alcohol itself that was making people behave differently, it was the very presence of alcohol - a cultural signal that we could let our guards down and make some noise.

Second, while I initially eased myself into drinking quite slowly, on one occasion I found my cup being constantly topped up by a colleague with shochu, a potent Japanese spirit. I knocked back quite a bit of shochu, even reaching a point where I started drinking beer instead in an attempt to sober up.

So I got drunk. When I walked I found it difficult to keep a straight line, when I talked my words were trying to blur at the edges. The typical physical consequences of drunkeness, then, were all there. But my mind was also there, struggling to control my less obedient body - I told people later it was like trying to control my body with chopsticks - but I lacked the decreased sense of inhibition and bloated sense of self worth that people always describe as going hand in hand with heavy alcohol use.

In fact I felt completely clear-minded, even a little self-conscious over my degraded balance. As I walked back to my hotel that evening, I was extremely cautious to cross the streets at pedestrian crossings, very aware of any threats that would be heightened because of my difficulties with balancing - fight or flight.

So what happened? Why did I not go shouting and laughing and dancing about the place like some other drunk people do? Social anthropologist Kate Fox writing on BBC may have an answer (my emphasis added):
In high doses, alcohol impairs our reaction times, muscle control, co-ordination, short-term memory, perceptual field, cognitive abilities and ability to speak clearly. But it does not cause us selectively to break specific social rules. It does not cause us to say, "Oi, what you lookin' at?" and start punching each other. Nor does it cause us to say, "Hey babe, fancy a shag?" and start groping each other.

The effects of alcohol on behaviour are determined by cultural rules and norms, not by the chemical actions of ethanol.
Fox explains that people who drink behave the way they expect alcohol to affect their behaviour. That is, in Mediterranean cultures drinkers consider alcohol 'morally neutral, normal, integral part of ordinary, everyday life', much like tea or coffee here, and as a result they do not behave wildly when drunk. When Irish or British people get raging drunk and lose all inhibitions it is their cultural expectation that is changing their behaviour, not the action of alcohol as a drug.
This basic fact has been proved time and again, not just in qualitative cross-cultural research, but also in carefully controlled scientific experiments - double-blind, placebos and all. To put it very simply, the experiments show that when people think they are drinking alcohol, they behave according to their cultural beliefs about the behavioural effects of alcohol.

The British and other ambivalent drinking cultures believe that alcohol is a disinhibitor, and specifically that it makes people amorous or aggressive, so when in these experiments we are given what we think are alcoholic drinks - but are in fact non-alcoholic "placebos" - we shed our inhibitions.

We become more outspoken, more physically demonstrative, more flirtatious, and, given enough provocation, some (young males in particular) become aggressive. Quite specifically, those who most strongly believe that alcohol causes aggression are the most likely to become aggressive when they think that they have consumed alcohol.
I grew up in a household with low alcohol consumption, I never saw my parents drunk and the occasional beer or wine consumed was treated in much the same way as tea or coffee - drunk for the pleasure of the taste and not for any behavioural changes it prompted. So perhaps I simply had not absorbed the same cultural message as many of my peers, I hadn't concluded that alcohol necessarily led to wild, uninhibited behaviour.

All interesting, though the point that astonishes me the most is that people were apparently able to get hammered drunk on placebos. Why do they bother buying expensive booze at all? Just have their friends present them with flavoured water and convince them it is vodka - free obliteration.

6 comments:

  1. "...people who drink behave the way they expect alcohol to affect their behaviour."

    That's a very interesting observation. So alcohol cannot be used as an excuse for irresponsible behaviour?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well it seems so, Tahera, though I only have Kate Fox and my own observations to back that up. I've seen people who drink vast amounts and behave sober throughout. I've seen others who get giddy and giggly BEFORE they start drinking, as if in anticipation of it!

    Though personally I would argue that even if alcohol is responsible for altering behaviour then responsibility still lies with the drinker - nobody forced him/her to get hammered drunk.

    ReplyDelete
  3. absorbing reading, Shane. As a non drinker married to an excessive one I spend too much social time in the company of drunks and am amazed when I hear myself admitting to having enjoyed a night full of unasked for advances or declarations of love and raucous undeserved laughter, not to mention the crude jokes and off key singing

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ah good for you! I used to be quite intolerant of it. By now I'm happy enough, so long as I know I can leave whenever things get really messy!

    ReplyDelete
  5. So . . . in Ireland, what is the morning after etiquette when the "disinhibited" friend or acquaintance has said WAY more than they would sans drink? Does one pretend nothing was said - or is it allowed to acknowledge all the repressed things that tumbled out of their mouths the previous night?

    Very Bewildered American

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Bewildered American! Well I guess I'm not the best person to ask, coming to the booze later than most and never really getting into the binge culture.

    I don't think, though, that there is a particular etiquette about this. You'd have to make a judgement call yourself. No simple solution, I'm afraid: good luck with that!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.